Parent Council For Deaf Education
Home About us How we help How you can help Information News & events
 

Parent information

PARENT STORIES

The Burfield Family

Read Mark and Misako's journey in deciding on a cochlear implant for Anita and their struggles with securing educational opportunities.
Read more...

The Mayfield Family

Read a mother's dedication to developing her son's language abilities and his subsequent blossoming into a fun loving, sensitive and caring young boy who sees his hearing loss as an inconvenience rather than a disability. Read more...

 

The Burfield Family

Misako and I were blessed with the birth of our first child, Anita, in June 1999. We were proud parents of our “bundle of joy” and everything about our new baby seemed perfectly normal. It was not until Anita’s six-monthly check-up at the Strathfield Early Childhood Centre, actually in January 2000, that the first inkling of a hearing problem was detected. We were referred from there to the Five Dock Early Childhood Centre because they apparently had better hearing test equipment. As this testing was still inconclusive, we were referred to Australian Hearing and went to our first appointment at their city office in April 2000. On arrival, Anita fell asleep so the appointment was rescheduled to a month later. This became an eventful occasion as Anita chewed and dribbled red chalk in the waiting room play area, was diagnosed as having a hearing problem, had moulds fitted, and cut her lip on a pen top. Misako and I received a copy of the Australian Hearing reference book “Choices”, and were informed that we all may need to learn how to sign, or else consider the possibility of a cochlear implant for Anita. I knew very little about this technology although ironically I recall seeing billboard advertising of Cochlear over Parramatta Road during our return visits from pre-natal classes at King George V Hospital during part of Misako’s pregnancy with Anita.

We were referred to the Sydney Cochlear Implant Centre (SCIC) but had to wait almost two months to June 2000 for an appointment with the eminent specialist, Prof. Bill Gibson, because he was overseas. The following day after this appointment was our third visit to Australian Hearing and the next day a visit to Burwood Public School to find out about early intervention and education options from the Assistant Principal (Itinerant Hearing Support). At this latter meeting, the terminology that Anita was “profoundly deaf” was first used. I remember wondering what this meant - eg, what was worse – profound or severe deafness? Anita was fitted with hearing aids at her fourth Australian Hearing appointment in July 2000, but it was a full year later before her cochlear implant operation. To begin with, the SCIC protocol at the time required clients to wear hearing aids for at least six months before commencing “candidacy evaluation” for an implant.

From the options presented for early intervention, we eventually made contact with the Catholic Centre for Hearing Impaired Children (CCHIC) in Strathfield due to its proximity to our home that at the time was also in Strathfield. The CCHIC Director visited our home and expressed that it was “fortunate Anita is profoundly deaf rather than severely deaf because she will be a clear candidate for a cochlear implant”. The next day Misako and Anita attended the regular Wednesday morning playgroup at CCHIC for the first time - and we have continued to attend the playground and other activities of CCHIC to this day, now with our two younger (hearing) children.

In August 2000, Anita went to the New Children’s Hospital in Westmead for an ECOG (electrocochleography) examination under general anaesthetic. Through this procedure, Prof. Birman was able to confirm conclusively that Anita was indeed profoundly deaf. Prior to this scientific proof, I was not entirely convinced of the extent of Anita’s hearing impairment, believing that the puppet tests used to assess hearing perception at Australian Hearing were a fallible testing method. Also from August 2000 until Anita began nursery school, an itinerant teacher from CCHIC visited our home for two one-hour sessions each week, modelling the techniques we could use with Anita and providing wonderful support.

The cochlear implant candidacy evaluation eventually began in February 2001 and required weekly appointments over a twelve-week period. I remember querying the purpose of the evaluation – was it to ascertain if Anita was really deaf or what? Because Misako is from Japan and had only limited English at the time, a translator was arranged for each appointment. As the evaluation process progressed it was suggested that the appointments should be held less frequently because by now Anita was in the habit of removing her hearing aids frequently (five times in as many minutes in one videoed session at SCIC!) This was considered a contra-indicator to the suitability of Anita as a cochlear implant recipient - the apparent logic being that she might do the same thing with an implant. I remember being highly stressed, confused, frustrated and angry at this stage. Fortunately the CCHIC Director at the time was equally concerned, and advocated directly to SCIC that the implant operation should proceed without further delay. I also followed the advice of a parent who had implanted children that I should “tell them what they want to hear”, so I informed SCIC that Anita was wearing her hearing aids consistently, although this wasn’t the case. Another mitigating factor was that Misako was pregnant with our second child due in October 2001. So the implant operation was ultimately re-scheduled back from September to July 2001, soon after Anita’s second birthday.

Anita had the required MRI scan at Westmead in May 2001. Because this was an afternoon appointment, she had to fast all morning. The anaesthetist was an hour late, so I remember being in the waiting room with a hysterical child who was no doubt wondering why her (highly stressed) parents wouldn’t feed her. I was at breaking point, considering if it was really worth this trauma to get an implant. Finally the implant operation took place at Westmead in August 2001. We were very impressed with Prof. Gibson as the surgeon, and the great support of the SCIC Family Counsellor and the CCHIC Director who both visited us at the hospital. The switch-on three weeks later was a magic moment that as the saying goes “didn’t leave a dry eye in the house”. Fortunately my parents could visit from Adelaide to witness this transformative, even spiritual experience that left us in awe of the genius of this life-changing technology. We have a delightful video recording of the occasion that is compelling viewing.

Weekly post-implant habilitation sessions soon commenced at SCIC and continued for a year to July 2002. Anita then went to a local day-care centre for six months for two days a week, before commencing in the nursery class for hearing impaired children at Penshurst Public School in January 2003, aged 3 ½. Over the next two years I opted to drive Anita to school each day from our new home in Croydon Park – an hour or more round trip including contact time in the class. (Fortunately she was driven home in the transport system provided for support class students from Week 3). Anita had a highly dedicated teacher and a good feature of his program was an hour session each week by this teacher with the parents and their child/ren. However over time it became evident that Anita’s language development was quite slow and we discussed the possibility of introducing visual cues. (Fortunately I have perceived a distinct mellowing over time of the previous hard line discouragement of the possible use of signing, lip-reading and other cues by cochlear implant recipients so that the “less successful” can be freed to explore this option without prejudice).

In seeking a primary school option for Anita, I took her for an assessment at Garfield Barwick School at North Parramatta in May 2004. The Principal immediately advised that she was not a suitable candidate for the school and we subsequently received a written report recommending that Anita would be better suited to a hearing support class in a regular school. I remember feeling quite humiliated that a school specialising in deaf children wouldn’t accept my deaf child! Of course there was a sound reason for their decision, because this school requires progressive integration into a local independent school. Now with few other viable options, it was clear that Anita should attend a hearing support class at the relatively local Burwood Public School. Luckily the class and teachers really impressed us when we visited there.

So Anita began in one of two hearing support classes at Burwood Public School in February 2005. By circumstance, I became the school’s P&C Association President in March 2005. The incumbent Principal, who was already on bereavement leave at the time of the AGM, decided to resign during the Term 1 holidays. A Relieving Principal began in Term 2, with no fixed idea when he might be moved on, although eventually he stayed to the end of the year. In this unsettled environment, the surprise news came during Term 4 that one of the two hearing support classes might be closed by the Department of Education & Training (DET) - despite two or more hearing support classes having been at the school for over thirty years. The support class teachers and I were incensed that there had been no consultation with themselves and the parents about this decision. However, the teachers were powerless to express their concerns without jeopardising their careers, so it was incumbent on me to be the voice of the parents and the teachers. Of course I raised the issue with the school community through the P&C Association, and with the Area Office. The Relieving Principal was actually on a Special Education committee, and he was highly supportive in trying to find ways to address the issue and to seek solutions.

Ultimately there was a meeting of the Area’s School Education Director, the Regional Coordinator for Disability Programs, the Relieving Principal, the Assistant Principal (Support Unit) and myself on 19 December 2005. At the meeting it became clear that the Department’s decision was not negotiable. The next day I was on the interview panel to select a new Principal for the school, and the following day was the last of the school year…so it was an intense finish to 2005.

On the first staff day of Term 1 2006, I was informed that the new Principal would need to ask one of the two hearing support class teachers to seek a nominated transfer. As events unfolded, Anita’s teacher in 2005 was able to stay on at the school – as a regular Year 6 class teacher – after thirty years of experience teaching the hearing impaired. So Anita is now in a composite class of up to 9 hearing impaired children that can span the primary age spectrum (Kindergarten to Year 6) whereas last year she was in a class of 4 hearing impaired children in the lower primary age spectrum (Kindergarten to Year 2). Fortunately her current class teacher, who taught the older primary students with hearing impairment in previous years, also has thirty years of experience teaching the hearing impaired.

I swung into campaign mode. The embattled new Principal counselled me not to go to the media, and I assured him this was not my intention. Instead I wrote to the South Western Sydney Regional Director and to my local Member of Parliament (who referred my concerns to the Minister for Education), plus other key stakeholders. I did not get a response from the Regional Director until early April, but I got a response from my local member within an hour! Frustrated by the delayed and inadequate responses from DET, I wrote to the NSW Ombudsman’s office in March expressing my concerns about the lack of consultation, the potential compromise of learning outcomes by creating such a broad composite class, and the lack of certainty about the future of the remaining hearing support class.

It was particularly infuriating to me that the DET website, under Disability Programs, stated that…“…Early next term (Term 4 of 2005) regional staff will consult with parents, principals and teachers to determine if there is a need to change the arrangement of these (special) classes…This process will only take place after local consultation to make sure individual needs and circumstances are fully considered…”
and yet the DET had not consulted at all with parents and teachers as key stakeholders in this instance.

Ironically, I also got a delayed and inadequate response from the Ombudsman’s office - I did not receive a response (beyond an acknowledgement of my correspondence) until July 2006. It was further evident from their reply that the office had only consulted with DET bureaucrats about my concerns and taken these responses at face value. However I believe one good thing in contacting the Ombudsman’s office was that it spurred the DET into action. I received a call from the new Acting Regional Director’s office during the Term 1 holidays and we could meet early in Term 2 (together with the School Principal and Area School Education Director). At this meeting I received an apology, and a genuine sense that the Acting Regional Director was intent on addressing my concerns to the extent that was reasonably possible.

In the meantime I made a posting to Aussie Deaf Kids about my concerns that resulted in contact with its founder, Ann Porter, and an invitation to the deferred AGM of the Parent Council for Deaf Education (PCDE) in April 2006. Ann further invited me to a meeting of a DET Committee on Hearing Impairment Issues and we also spoke at a Hearing Support Unit Family Night at Penshurst Public School.

Most recently I have read through the Auditor-General’s Performance Audit on “Educating Primary School Students with Disabilities” (released in September 2006) and have a concern about the Recommendation that DET “…by 2008, change the way special classes are organised from disability type to classes based around the support and educational needs of students…”. I understand the Education Minister intends that specific hearing support classes will continue, but I believe this must be confirmed and monitored.

In conclusion, I am frustrated that delays in the detection of a hearing impairment for my daughter and subsequent circumstantial and procedural delays have meant that Anita, now aged seven, struggles so much with language even after five years of constantly wearing a cochlear implant. (Conversely I am delighted that there is now a SWISH program for early detection of hearing impairment). I am understandably concerned by any actions or inactions that may further compromise Anita’s language development, or that of any hearing-impaired child, hence my heightened concern about the machinations of DET that appear ultimately based on cost-cutting. This is where parent advocacy is so essential to ensure that government and other entities remain sensitive to, inclusive of, and accountable to parents as key stakeholders. 

I look forward to continuing to advocate as and if required for my daughter and for hearing impaired children generally. I certainly believe that there is strength in numbers, so if we work collaboratively on issues of concern, eg through the Parent Council for Deaf Education, then there is more likelihood that we can achieve the outcomes we desire.

Mark Burfield

 

Top of page

The Mayfield Family

My husband and I have two sons. Cory is our eldest and is now 12 years of age. He has a mild to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss that we believe was acquired from birth. Bilateral meaning in both ears and sensorineural refers to the damage in the cochlea or auditory nerve. This is a permanent and irreversible loss.

Soon after Cory was born his health deteriorated rapidly. He developed an acute respiratory infection and within hours he was transported to Prince of Wales Intensive Care Unit. He remained there for 3 weeks. For a good part of that time he was hooked up to a life support system, that he was totally dependant upon, with an array of leads, warmers, catheters and every drug that was available was administered. Without exaggeration he looked like the inside of a dashboard. We came very close to loosing him a couple of times but he just scraped through escaping a lung bypass after his lungs collapsed. He has always been a real fighter and it was evident then, that he wasn’t going to give up at any point without a battle.

He recovered and came home, but little did we know this was to set off a chain reaction to a whole host of problems for the next 6 months, at which point another bombshell would be dropped upon us taking us changing our lives forever.

By the time Cory was 6 months old things had begun to settle. He was off medication, his lungs had made an extraordinary recovery and he had been passing all of the usual developmental tests, including the early hearing test. 

At this point his clinic sister had noticed on his records that he had been administered an ototoxic drug that can be detrimental to hearing. It was to be discovered much later that although the drugs had been monitored carefully and shouldn’t have damaged his hearing, it was probably the combination of so much oxygen over such a long period and the susceptibility to ototoxic drugs that ultimately lead to his deafness. 

We then began testing. Testing, testing and more testing. It was extremely difficult to fight back emotions of grief, anger, guilt and confusion while watching Cory fail at each one. We would put on a bright, happy and positive facade as it was necessary that your child be well, happy, attentive and focused for these long, arduous tests in hot, stuffy, sound proof rooms. Most audiologists did what they could to make them playful and fun, but persuading a toddler to sit behind a desk attentively, keeping him stimulated and motivated for periods of ½ hour or more was exhausting for all.

Dealing with professionals in the field was at first very difficult. I was suddenly faced with having to decipher jargon like visual reinforcement orientation, audiometry, tympanometry, bilateral, sensorineural hearing loss, frequencies, decibels, audiograms and so on. I found myself doing a self-taught crash course on paediatric audiology. Finding information was difficult. People simply didn’t offer it to you. You had to draw it out of them – that’s just the way it was. We spoke to many families and went through many audiologists, specialist and hours spent in waiting rooms lugging around bags of stimulating toys and books to keep our little boy occupied, before we finally found the best. I now have a reputation for my persistence that I’m proud of and respected for.

This was a particularly difficult time for us. My husband and the extended family did not accept his hearing loss and I felt very alone for some time.

With months of glue ear masking a suspected hearing loss, at 18 months of age he was finally diagnosed and hearing aids were fitted. This is considered a very late diagnosis, as early intervention is crucial. At last we could finally begin to communicate. We were one of the lucky ones as Cory accepted the aids well and began to rely on them immediately as this opened up a whole new world for him.

Just after this Cory’s hearing began to deteriorate. He was back in hospital for more invasive testing. The first required sedation and external probes, but was unsuccessful. The second was a cat scan and the third required sedation and an internal probe to his inner ear. The latter was probably the most conclusive but still provided no straight answers. We were to wait years before we could be relaxed about the fact that his hearing probably would not deteriorate any further.

Amidst all of this we were faced with the decision of selecting from an array of educational organizations and communicative methods in order for our child to learn a language with which he could communicate (either oral or sign, if the aids were unsuccessful). You see language acquisition occurs naturally and spontaneously with hearing children through life experiences and simply being around people who talk. For hearing impaired children this is simply not the case. It wasn’t an easy, clear cut decision by any means. It was another long arduous process that we went through. Arranging meetings, researching and deciding between oral communication and signing. If we chose to sign, should it be Signed English or Auslan? If we chose the oral approach, which method? Auditory Verbal, based on developing sophisticated listening skills or Total Communication, a combination of listening, lip reading, Signed English and finger spelling. Those who taught these methods were often biased in their opinion, which made the decision even more difficult. Then, should it be through the Department of Education, St Gabriel’s, the Shepard Centre or the Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind Children. In retrospect, we dived in with eyes closed but we went with our instincts and it turned out to be the best and wisest decision of all.

We chose to go through the Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind Children’s Homestart Program and follow the Auditory Verbal method.

We started the program immediately with enthusiasm and dedication. With our limited understanding we at least knew that those factors had to be present if any program was to work successfully. We had a teacher, who specialised in deaf education visit our home once a week – the most dynamic, creative and capable teacher I’ve ever had the privilege of knowing and working with. Cory’s language developed slowly through “play”. To him it appeared very natural, exciting and fun. However, this took great planning, goal setting, evaluating, monitoring and saturating him with lots and lots of quality, meaningful language from the time he woke to the time he went to bed.

This became a steep learning curve for me. This is where I learned to love to teach (even if it was just my children) and I developed a real thirst for knowledge in both fields of audiology and language development. I had wonderful support all around me. The staff at the Institute grabbed hold of my enthusiasm, which in turn gave me some feeling of control and empowerment (neither of which I had felt for a long time) and we did wonderful things together.

Cory’s language acquisition, self esteem, concentration and personality flourished. Family finally came to accept the fact that his loss was real and permanent and we began to work as a team. Cory slowly began to pass milestone upon milestone and the hard work began to pay off.

We overcame our fear of the likelihood of having another sick baby and decided to have one more child, which was what we had always wanted. During the pregnancy I met a mother with 3 children, 1 hearing and 2 with a hearing loss. On having her third child, she discovered that the hearing loss was genetic. I had not been aware of this genetic disorder and found myself once again visiting genetic specialists and researching in libraries, as the cause of Cory’s deafness had only been an assumption. Once again, after lots of assessing we were left with conflicting reports and no real answers. We waited for our second child to be born. We came across a doctor in Chatswood who had a wonderful new machine that pretty accurately measured babies for hearing loss. He was born and the tests showed he had full hearing.

Cory started at a local preschool soon after. Before long it became evident that they could not meet his needs simply because they lacked the expertise required. We made yet another heart rendering decision to move him to a preschool set up by the Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind children at Glenmore Park, Penrith, which would require an enormous amount of travelling. This proved to be another successful move. The most brilliant preschool I have ever come across. Glenmore Park Early Childhood Centre together with the Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind Children held a philosophy, attitude, program and united team that was second to none; a reverse integration program with a primary focus on families. Where parents are informed, consulted and involved in all aspects of the program and where staff work collaboratively with parents to ensure the best possible education for the children. Where the grounds were landscaped and the centre set up to provide an exciting and interesting learning environment for the children; a role model for any educational organization, at any level, to follow.

Soon after, Cory began to develop a moderate to severe stutter. This had nothing to do with his hearing loss nor did it appear genetic. It was simply bad luck.

Cory had just begun to listen and speak when this physical disorder crept in to hold him back once again.

We found an excellent speech therapist that had been recently involved in researching “a break through” therapy to successfully manage this disorder. So for the next 18 months we travelled for 1 hour to stuttering therapy each week, 4 x 45min trips a day, 3 days a week to preschool, welcomed our Homestart teacher into our home once a week and attempted to do all the normal things that parents do with their children, like swimming, playgroup and family picnics. Between that, I was left with a program from each of the 3 teachers that had to be applied each day as well as graph, tape, monitor, evaluate, set goals and much more. Lessons and therapy took a lot of engineering to appear like natural, spontaneous and fun play. He never knew the difference and loved it. Cory has always had a thirst for knowledge and vital interest in everything around him, which made things easier.

Cory continued to blossom. The stuttering had finally stopped. He had developed confidence, assertiveness, sophisticated listening skills, articulation, the ability to manage his FM and aids independently and was ahead academically, all before the age of 5. He was totally groomed for big school, which was our next decision. I visited many schools. Again it felt like a stab in the dark and again it turned out to be the right choice. I selected a local Public school for a number of reasons. I liked the feel of the school, the children and teachers within it. It was vital for Cory to have good role models and it was evident that there were many there. Attached to the school was a hearing support unit and a number of students with hearing impairment already mainstreamed. This was ideal as there were children there that he could identify with. I persuaded the relevant staff that Cory was ready to be integrated in a mainstream kindergarten class. They were soon convinced that this was the right move as he settled in well and made great progress.

However, I was completely unprepared for big school. For all this time I had been involved and in total control of every aspect of Cory’s learning and suddenly I felt like it had been all ripped away. I knew that I would take a more formal role now by placing my child’s education in a strangers hands, with very little communication between us, was incredibly difficult to accept and it took many years before I felt relaxed about it.

Cory progressed extraordinary well through primary, participating in everything from public speaking to drama. Over time he developed a wide circle of friends, one of which he has maintained a relationship with since Year 2 and still holds to date. However, this progress did not go unassisted. His itinerant teachers tirelessly supported him through the years and Cory willingly put in many hours of work, at home, above and beyond most children his age. At times, building parent – teacher relations seemed agonisingly slow. I guess because people feel threatened by something they’re not familiar with. Most found that little change was needed and they relaxed into it.

Amidst this our youngest son, after much investigation, was diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder and for sometime the focus shifted to him. Cory found this very difficult at first. However, despite well-documented evidence of the impact children with disabilities have on their siblings, both have learnt to adjust and compromise as well as can be expected. He is now doing exceeding well but there is still a lot of work ahead.

Before we knew it the decision of a high school was before us. I guess the decision was made a little easier this time, as it was evident that Cory would need a school that would provide a caring yet controlled environment. With the experience and advice of a dear friend, with children, one hearing impaired, already at the school, a local Anglican College seemed a natural choice. It is now apparent we have made the right move. Both boys are now attending this school. Both continually express their contentment in being there and their confidence continues to flourish.

Cory continues to do extremely well today with the wonderful support of his itinerant teacher and class teachers.

At most, Cory struggles in noisy situations, at sports carnivals, on excursions, in the playground and watching TV’s and cinemas without captions. He also has difficulty sometimes with jokes and innuendo. He uses strategies to overcome these obstacles, however, unknowingly to most and to him, he still misses out on a lot.

At most, I struggle with the unreceptivity of some people in relation to hearing loss, despite my sensitivity to their lack of understanding. However, awareness is growing slowly and this is encouraging.

Cory has had to overcome enormous obstacles in his short life and his achievements are many. With years of hard work his speech is now so articulate and his academic performance is so high that it is easy to forget his degree of loss and the assistance that is still required to keep him there. Over the years, he has participated well in softball, swimming, soccer, scouts, tennis and, to my astonishment, guitar. Cory has settled into high school amazingly well. He loves it here and continually speaks highly of his teachers and the school. Cory is a fun loving, sensitive and caring young boy who sees his handicap as an inconvenience rather than a disability. His conscientious and motivated nature is one to be admired.

The biggest handicap these children face are the low goals we set for them. They can achieve anything their hearts desire but only with the tireless support of their families and the expertise of dedicated professionals.

Top of page

 

 

 

Note: We use the term 'deaf' to mean all types of deafness

 
Copyright 2006. Parent Council For Deaf Education